This may be why you feel lethargic: “spontaneous physical activity” dropped by almost a half after prolonged dietary restriction.

Below, there is a table from a study published in the year 2000 by Weyer, Walford and colleagues (1). The study described human metabolism during and after 24 months of (unintended) caloric restriction experiment in the “Biosphere-2” confinement.

The interesting fact that we see in the data (the table below) is the reduction of “spontaneous physical activity” by almost a half in the calorie-restricted subjects in comparison to controls. This marker, “spontaneous physical activity” remained low even 6 months after the calorie restriction ended.

In the subjects who spent 24 months in a calorie restricted state, “spontaneous physical activity” remained low even 6 months after the end of calorie restriction. “Physical characteristics of the control subjects and of the subgroup of 5 biospherians in whom 24-h energy metabolism was assessed in a respiratory chamber at within 1 wk and 6 mo after exit from Biosphere.”

The diet in the Biosphere-2 was a high carb diet.

Table 2. Nutrient Contents of the Daily Food Intakes Represented in Table 1. From Walford, 2002.

“Spontaneous physical activity” can theoretically be used as a marker of “general vitality”. It is possible that when “spontaneous physical activity” is low, the individual is less motivated and less active in many areas of his life. Some may even feel lethargic”.

This is something that we periodically observe in our consulting practice. Many people go on the popular restrictive diets, miscalculate their energy needs and “intuitively” undereat. Spending months in a calorically restricted state, as we can see from the study by Weyer and Walford (1), may result in subtle changes in behavior that are not easily reversed.

In the snapshots below, you can see one of the participants of the “Biosphere-2” 24-month experiment with involuntary caloric deprivation, Roy L. Walford. The photo is from another study describing the experiments.

At the end of the experiment, Walford looks unhealthy. The impression is partially due to an almost complete loss of fat mass.

Composite photograph of the senior author (R. Walford) after 15 months residence inside Biosphere 2 (on the left: weight 119 lb or 54 kg), and 18 months after exiting Biosphere 2 (on the right: weight 150 lb, or 68 kg; normal weight when on an ad libitum diet).

We, somewhat forensically, identified Walford in the list of participants’ characteristics. We can see that at the end of the 24 months, skeletal looking Walford had a BMI of 18.

Physical characteristics of the 8 biospherians at entry. From Weyer, Walford and colleagues, 2000.
BMI changes of the 8 biospherians at entry. From Walford and colleagues, 2002.

Our consulting clients, as well as people who follow our research on SHBG, will take a note of how Walford’s SHBG evolved during the observation period. Walford was 67 when he entered the “Biosphere-2” confinement. When he already looked skeletal, his SHBG was not so bad for a 67 years old man. During the recovery period, Walford’s SHBG even went down to 31nmol/L.

BMI changes of the 8 biospherians at entry. From Walford and colleagues, 2002.

The verdict.

Beware of an excessive or an unintended caloric restriction on the currently popular restrictive diets of all kinds. Eating intuitively, another currently popular trend, may not always work. Undesirable changes in hormones and in behavior may occur.


Selected References:

1. Christian Weyer, Roy L Walford, Inge T Harper, Mike Milner, Taber MacCallum, P Antonio Tataranni, and Eric Ravussin,
Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:946–53.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *